A convincing victory for Vodafone puts further pressure on the
Government to come up with a workable solution for CFCs
Monday 14 July 2008
The High Court judgment in the 'Vodafone 2' case
was released on 4 July 2008. This is an important case on the UK's
Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC) legislation. What are the
implications for UK multinationals?
What does the CFC legislation aim to do?
The CFC rules apply to offshore companies that are owned by UK
companies. The aim of the legislation is to prevent the avoidance
of UK corporation tax on the profits of low taxed foreign resident,
but UK-controlled, companies.
What was the Vodafone case about?
Vodafone argued that the UK CFC rules were contrary to European
Union (EU) law in particular the 'freedom of establishment'. In
reaching its decision the High Court considered the judgment of the
European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the Cadbury Schweppes
case. In broad terms, in the Cadbury Schweppes
case, the ECJ said that the UK CFC legislation would only comply
with EU law if it could be shown that it only applied to wholly
artificial arrangements and asked the UK courts to consider this
further.
In Vodafone 2 the High Court considered whether the CFC
rules can be interpreted only to apply to artificial arrangements.
In this case the judge said that there were no words within the CFC
rules that could lead to this interpretation, nor was it possible
to imply additional words that would achieve this aim. Even if this
could be done, it would not give sufficient certainty to taxpayers.
Further, the judge implied in passing that the amendments to the
CFC rules, introduced by the Government in 2006 in response to the
ECJ's decision in the Cadbury Schweppes case, may
themselves be contrary to EU law.
The High Court concluded that the legislation must be disapplied
and so HM Revenue and Customs’ (HMRC's) enquiry into Vodafone’s tax
return must be closed. This is a convincing victory for Vodafone,
even though an appeal is certain to take place.
What are the implications of the decision?
The decision found that the UK’s CFC rules, at least for periods
up to 2006, do not comply with EU law. The judgment concluded by
saying that the CFC rules must be disapplied and that no charge can
be imposed on a company such as Vodafone under the CFC rules.
Although HMRC will undoubtedly appeal, this is still a crucial
judgment and blows a huge hole in the Government’s strategy. It
also has implications for the ongoing consultation process on the
taxation of foreign profits.
Roopa Aitken, an International Tax Partner at
Grant Thornton says: "The decision could have wide
application, as it sets out in detail the principles that the UK
Courts will use in deciding whether UK law properly complies with
EU requirements. It also shows the urgent need for the consultation
process on foreign profits to address deficiencies in the CFC
rules. It is hoped that any new rules will be supportive of UK
headquartered groups."
She continues: "Taxpayers who have open enquiries on CFC rules
in relation to EU subsidiaries should seek to have those closed
without any tax charge. Taxpayers who have suffered a tax charge in
the past on CFCs, where there were genuine economic activities
within the EU, should consider whether a repayment should be
claimed."
Please click here to contact us if you
would like further advice and assistance on any of the issues
raised above.